Cheeky Scientist’s cover photo
Cheeky Scientist

Cheeky Scientist

Professional Training and Coaching

We turn PhDs into confident and successful industry professionals.

About us

Who We Are Cheeky Scientist is an industry training platform for academic PhDs who are ready to become confident and successful industry professionals. Our Purpose Only 2% of Fortune 500 CEOs have PhDs (StatisticBrain Report). Our purpose and mission is to increase this number to 51%. ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Our Goals 1) Place 100,000 academics into industry positions. 2) Support all advanced degree programs in providing industry training to their students, members, and researchers. 3) Enact change that requires all government-funded principle investigators and academics to receive management and financial training. ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ How Things Are Changing Today, only 0.45% of PhDs will go on to be professors (Royal Society). That's only 1 in 222. The number of PhDs from all backgrounds who will be unemployed after graduation is above 60%. The number of Life Sciences PhDs who will be unemployed after graduation is above 80%. In the U.S., the national average for a postdoc salary is only $46,100 per year (PayScale), while the national average for a PhD employed in industry is $91,200 (Science Magazine, National Science Foundation). ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ What We Offer The Cheeky Scientist Association When you become a Cheeky Scientist Associate, you gain exclusive access to our private PhD-only job referral network of 4,000 industry professional. You also gain access to our complete PhD-level job search blueprint, which includes over 100 industry training videos as well as a lifetime pass to the 50+ live webinars we host each year, access to the complete Transition Plan and Industry Insider Series, and lifetime access to our private online support community. Enrollment for the Cheeky Scientist Association is only open 4 weeks a year. Click here to get notified when enrollment opens next: http://xmrrwallet.com/cmx.pcheekyscientist.com/association Visit us today: http://xmrrwallet.com/cmx.pcheekyscientist.com/

Website
http://xmrrwallet.com/cmx.pwww.cheekyscientist.com
Industry
Professional Training and Coaching
Company size
51-200 employees
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2013
Specialties
Career Consulting, Career Training, Career Development, PhD Networking, PhD Jobs, PhD Job, Alternative Careers, Careers Away From The Bench, Careers Outside of Academia, ScientistMBA, Nature Jobs, Transitioning Out Of Academia, Job Search, Career Transitions, PhD Careers, Science Careers, SciPhD, Industry Careers, Industry Jobs, BioCareers, PhD Chat, PhD Comics, Cheeky Scientist, Cheeky Scientist Association, MSL Careers, R&D Careers, and PhD Job Search

Locations

Employees at Cheeky Scientist

Updates

  • If you’re a PhD applying to jobs with a resume you spent days perfecting, only to get ghosted or instantly rejected, you’re not alone. The system isn’t built for people like you. Most PhDs are trained to write for intellectuals—to communicate with precision, variety, and depth. But AI resume filters don’t care about nuance. They reward simplicity, repetition, and keyword density. And if you’re not giving them that, you’re getting screened out before a human ever sees your name. Modern AI filters scan resumes for exact-match keywords. If the job posting says “project management,” the system is looking for the phrase “project management” on your resume—not “oversaw initiatives” or “led cross-functional efforts.” In fact, some systems won’t even flag your resume as “targeted” unless the keyword appears twice or more. But what do most PhDs do? They avoid repeating themselves. They use a range of synonyms. They try to sound sharp, not redundant. Because in academia, repetition feels like a mistake. In industry hiring systems, it’s required. This mismatch is killing your chances. AI doesn’t care how smart you sound. It cares whether your resume has the right strings of text in the right amounts. That’s it. Most PhDs assume their experience speaks for itself. It doesn’t. It only speaks when it’s translated into the language the system is looking for. And that language is shockingly basic. It’s bullet points that begin with transferable skills. It’s phrases pulled straight from job postings. It’s the same few words repeated until the filter gives you a green light. If this feels beneath you, get over it. You’re not dumbing yourself down—you’re making yourself visible. Your research, your intellect, your accomplishments—they don’t matter if no one ever sees them. And no one will if you keep writing resumes for peer reviewers instead of parsing bots. This is the part where you stop being proud and start being strategic. Repeat the exact keywords. Use their words, not yours. Focus on clarity over cleverness. And if that feels repetitive, good. It means you’re finally doing it right.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Too many PhD job candidates are writing cover letters like it’s still 2005—lengthy, over-formal, and entirely focused on themselves. “Dear Esteemed Hiring Committee,” “It is with genuine enthusiasm and professional conviction that I submit this letter…” Sound familiar? These openings don’t sell you. They signal distance, ego, and outdated thinking. A recent example shows the contrast clearly. The original version of a candidate’s letter was nearly 700 words and full of passive structure: “I believe my decades of experience and academic grounding uniquely position me…” It sounded polished, but it didn’t sound human. The rewrite was under 200 words and started with: “I want this role.” It dropped the jargon, cut the fluff, and emphasized urgency, clarity, and personality. That’s the key shift: from being impressive to being approachable. From listing history to showing intent. From reciting achievements to expressing commitment. That’s what today’s hiring managers are looking for. You don’t need to prove you’re smart. You need to prove you’re someone worth working with. Someone who wants the job and is ready to deliver. So how do you write a modern cover letter? Skip the grand intro. Be direct. Mention someone you’ve spoken to. Align with the company’s mission. Highlight how you work, not just what you’ve done. Speak like a peer, not a scholar. Say you want the job—and say why. Your value isn’t in your title or years of experience. It’s in how you show up, communicate, and help the employer succeed. This is especially true if you’re a PhD. If your resume already screams experience, your cover letter needs to show humility, clarity, and focus. It should say things like “I’m not here to coast—I’m here to contribute,” and “I can do this job from day one.” Most of all, it should make the reader want to talk to you. The biggest mistake PhD job seekers make is trying to win the role by out-resuméing the competition. You win by being more human. More direct. More ready. Your future boss isn’t hiring a bio. They’re hiring a person.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Most job seekers today don’t realize that getting hired isn’t just about your background—it’s about how certain you make employers feel. Hiring managers aren’t just scanning resumes for skills. They’re looking for conviction. And if you can’t answer two questions with rock-solid certainty—“Why should we hire you?” and “Why do you want to work here?”—you’ll keep getting passed over.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • If you're trying to get hired into industry, your LinkedIn profile is already being used to assess your personality—even if you haven’t written a word about it. A peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Research in Personality titled Using available signals on LinkedIn for personality assessment confirms that your digital footprint gives away whether you're open, conscientious, extraverted, agreeable—or neurotic. These Big Five traits are used by psychologists to measure long-term behavioral tendencies. And now? They’re being measured by AI to decide whether you're interview material. The worst part? Most PhD candidates aren’t showing up as the traits they actually are. Many are high in conscientiousness but their profiles are missing the signals that show it. At the same time, they’re accidentally signaling high neuroticism—leading AI filters to reject them before a human ever sees their name. The good news? This is fixable. You can start today by making specific changes to how you present yourself online. - Add a smiling profile photo to signal agreeableness. - Wear professional attire for conscientiousness and stability. - List skills like “organization” and “time management.” - Write a detailed summary to express openness. - Mention leadership or teamwork to signal extraversion and agreeableness. - Follow at least five thought leaders in your target industry to reflect openness. - Include public-facing skills like “communication,” “presentation,” or “public speaking.” - Add continuing education, volunteering experiences, recommendations, awards, and any foreign languages spoken. These are not fluff. They’re behavioral indicators being read by AI systems and scored accordingly. If your profile doesn’t show signs of being open, conscientious, extraverted, and agreeable—or worse, if it gives off signals of neuroticism—you may not make it past the algorithm. These tiny details can be the difference between getting filtered in or filtered out. You might think you’re just “keeping it simple.” But in today’s market, silence is not neutral. Silence is negative.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • PhD job seekers make one of the most damaging mistakes in today’s market: they wait for the “perfect fit.” You see a job posting, scan the bullet points, and instead of asking yourself how to position your experience to solve that company’s problems, you disqualify yourself the moment there’s one thing you haven’t done before. You move on, assuming it’s smarter to wait for something that matches your exact background. But this mindset doesn’t protect you. It boxes you in. And in a hiring market defined by speed, automation, and risk-aversion, waiting for perfection is the fastest way to fall behind. Job descriptions are not checklists—they’re marketing documents. If you meet 60% of the job description and understand what matters most to the company, you’re in the running. But if you walk away every time you’re not a perfect match on paper, you’ll miss dozens of opportunities—many of which you could’ve grown into fast. PhDs, in particular, get trapped here. You’ve earned your credibility. And that makes it easy to see any skill gap as a threat to your image. But the reality is this: employers are hiring for attitude, adaptability, and problem-solving far more than for perfection. They want to know you’ll show up, figure things out, and be someone they don’t have to second-guess. That’s not about credentials—it’s about initiative. And that’s something you can show from the first message, regardless of whether you meet every bullet point. So apply anyway. Customize your resume. Speak directly to their pain points. Don’t wait for the perfect fit. Create the connection yourself. That’s what the best candidates are doing—and that’s why they’re getting hired while others stay stuck waiting for alignment that doesn’t exist. Perfect-fit thinking feels safe. But it’s costing you opportunities. You’re not being strategic—you’re hesitating. And hesitation is how overqualified candidates get overlooked. Don’t wait for permission. Apply, adapt, and move forward now.

    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages

Browse jobs