Designing with AI: Lazy, Efficient, or Just Smarter?
Image created with Microsoft Copilot

Designing with AI: Lazy, Efficient, or Just Smarter?

Reflections from UXReactor, part of Ascendion, on integrating generative AI into user-centered design


Introduction: The Temptation of AI

AI is the hot topic of the year — possibly the decade. At UXReactor, part of Ascendion, we’ve been piloting various generative AI tools across our workflow: user research, strategy, wireframes, and even visual design. A full list of AI tools and platforms is provided below.

The promise is clear: faster iterations, endless ideation, and instant design options. But can we skip the traditional UX process and jump straight to UI? We tried. And here’s what we learned.


The Attraction of Jumping Ahead

Generative AI tools can give you three design options for a high-level concept in seconds. Ideation feels free. The dopamine hits fast. But here’s the catch: context matters.


Why Context Still Rules

Without understanding the problem space, user pain points, motivations, or current journeys, even the most beautiful UI falls flat.

AI can generate options, but it can’t tell you which one solves the right problem. That’s where primary research still matters.

Recommendation: Use AI to accelerate your research, not replace it.

  • Summarize transcripts, generate themes

  • Generate proto-personas

  • Explore user journeys

  • Create documents, conduct deep research, and write reports

But always validate with real users.


Prompt Quality = Output Quality

You get what you ask for. Poor prompts lead to poor design directions. And while AI is great at exploring options, it struggles to narrow them down.

This is where human judgment shines. Ideation is free. Choosing wisely? That’s still on us.


The Decide–Do–Decide–Do Framework

We’ve found this framework helpful:

  • Decide what to explore

  • Do it with AI

  • Decide what to keep

  • Do the next iteration

AI excels at the “Do.” But the “Decide” still requires human insight, experience, and empathy.


The 5Ds Still Matter

Discover, Define, Design, Develop, Deploy: AI speeds through all five — but doesn’t replace any. Skipping discovery or definition leads to shallow solutions. Skipping usability testing leads to surprises later.

PDF copy of the 5D Product Development process with human-centered UX activities available at UXReactor.com

5-D Product Development Process with key Human-Centered activities for UX Strategy, User Research, and Design

A Personal Reflection: Lazy or Efficient?

When I started writing this article, I used Copilot to organize my thoughts — let’s call that V1. Then I switched to pen and paper to sketch the outline — V2. Back to Copilot for drafting — V3. And finally, polish and refinement — V4.

So am I lazy? Efficient? Maybe both. But I’m definitely more strategic — using AI where it helps, and leaning on human judgment where it matters.


Final Thoughts

At UXReactor, we’re embracing AI not to skip steps, but to accelerate rigor. We’re still user-centered. Still strategy-first. However, we’re now faster, more exploratory, and more empowered.

Generative AI is a powerful partner. But the best designs still come from humans who understand humans.


 

List of Generative AI tools we regularly use and experiment with during the entire Product Development Lifecycle for UX Strategy, User Research, and Design.

Ascendion’s AAVA™ Platform: https://xmrrwallet.com/cmx.pascendion.com/how-we-deliver/aava/

ChatGPT

Copilot

Claude

Mid Journey

Loveable.dev

Replit

V0.dev

Stitch (from Google)

Firebase

HeyMarvin


Thanks for sharing, Kuldeep. Given some of this, how do you see AI changing UXReactor/Ascendion's monetization models?

Adrienne Tucker, Ph.D.

UX Research Leader (Ph.D.) | Ex Google & Meta | Scientist-Turned-Strategist | AI Aficionado | Expert in Human Behavior | Mentor to Emerging Researchers

1w

Using AI to accelerate rigor - interesting frame

Kuldeep Kelkar

Book Author: 'Strengthen Your User Research Superpowers'. Now available on Amazon.

1w
Like
Reply
Marianne Cobbs (Métairie)

Lead Product Designer | Product Strategy + Design Leadership for Startups | 10+ yrs | SaaS, AI, Fintech

1w

Great insights! “Prompt quality = output quality” is so underrated in design work. AI can support but not replace the rigor of real research.

AJ Perez

Tech whisperer, bridge-builder between business + humans, and a relentless problem-solver with 25 years experience. My toolkit? Lean research, creative design, rapid prototyping, and a whole lot of collaboration.

1w

Hey Kuldeep, former Userzoom colleague here 🙂, although I think we only met once or twice. Great article! My point of view on this subject has changed in the past few weeks. I can now see a future without UIs, as Jakob Nielsen has pointed out. Or better said, a future where UIs are generated as needed, in real time, for the context and the needs of the user. The efficiency gains we have now mean that it is cheaper to fail, and I think that will also impact UX workflows. Research might look for everyone closer to what startups do with lean.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics